<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 09/29/14 &#8211; Bruno Chooses Sides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brunostrip.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=4466</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 03:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kona</title>
		<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=4466&#038;cpage=1#comment-280794</link>
		<dc:creator>Kona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=4466#comment-280794</guid>
		<description>Just speculating, it could be difficult to be known to be bisexual; it removes that many more people from your world you think you can count on not to have ulterior motives.  

Ronald:  That&#039;s a star?  All I saw at first was a wheel with spokes.  Now can&#039;t unsee...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just speculating, it could be difficult to be known to be bisexual; it removes that many more people from your world you think you can count on not to have ulterior motives.  </p>
<p>Ronald:  That&#8217;s a star?  All I saw at first was a wheel with spokes.  Now can&#8217;t unsee&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronald</title>
		<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=4466&#038;cpage=1#comment-76259</link>
		<dc:creator>ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=4466#comment-76259</guid>
		<description>I remain politely dubious about the &quot;needs to get laid&quot; theory. Plenty of sexually active people are nonetheless jerks (no pun intended).

Really, when you think about it (&quot;So don&#039;t think about it.&quot;), it&#039;s odd that the &quot;religious right&quot; doesn&#039;t take a stand against the idea that sex is a necessary prerequisite for good health because, after all, that would mean that all unmarried people would be doomed to poor health because, from the &quot;religious right&quot; perspective, non-marital sex is &quot;bad&quot; (except when they&#039;re doing it, of course). It&#039;d at least give them less time to devote to other subjects.

On another note, does the &quot;star&quot; in the window in Panel 1 mean anything in particular? It&#039;s not a Star of David and I don&#039;t right off recall what else a six-pointed star might mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remain politely dubious about the &#8220;needs to get laid&#8221; theory. Plenty of sexually active people are nonetheless jerks (no pun intended).</p>
<p>Really, when you think about it (&#8220;So don&#8217;t think about it.&#8221;), it&#8217;s odd that the &#8220;religious right&#8221; doesn&#8217;t take a stand against the idea that sex is a necessary prerequisite for good health because, after all, that would mean that all unmarried people would be doomed to poor health because, from the &#8220;religious right&#8221; perspective, non-marital sex is &#8220;bad&#8221; (except when they&#8217;re doing it, of course). It&#8217;d at least give them less time to devote to other subjects.</p>
<p>On another note, does the &#8220;star&#8221; in the window in Panel 1 mean anything in particular? It&#8217;s not a Star of David and I don&#8217;t right off recall what else a six-pointed star might mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
