<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10/16/2017</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brunostrip.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=6908</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 03:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ronald</title>
		<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=6908&#038;cpage=1#comment-295904</link>
		<dc:creator>ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=6908#comment-295904</guid>
		<description>In the first place, I am not &quot;mocking&quot; social interaction, or rather, HUMAN INTERACTION; that&#039;s the phrase I used. The distinction is subjective, of course.

Aside from simply obeying a whim, I was pointing out that, while so many others seem to think that human interaction is the key to everything, it is, in this case, obviously unpleasant, messy, and a downright pain in the *ss. Thus the notion that human interaction is the be-all end-all is just as fallacious as the notion that solitude is death of the soul. If I had a point of any kind at all -- and I can by no means guarantee that I did (because, as noted, it was a whim) -- that was it.

I have spent my life having people tell me that the solution to any emotional turmoil that I might experience lies in imitating THEIR behavior. I&#039;ve rarely found such advice to be anything but simplistic.

Furthermore, THIS does not meet my definition of human interaction (if you define it differently, well, that&#039;s fine). We&#039;re not physically in the same room exchanging bursts of linguistic communication. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first place, I am not &#8220;mocking&#8221; social interaction, or rather, HUMAN INTERACTION; that&#8217;s the phrase I used. The distinction is subjective, of course.</p>
<p>Aside from simply obeying a whim, I was pointing out that, while so many others seem to think that human interaction is the key to everything, it is, in this case, obviously unpleasant, messy, and a downright pain in the *ss. Thus the notion that human interaction is the be-all end-all is just as fallacious as the notion that solitude is death of the soul. If I had a point of any kind at all &#8212; and I can by no means guarantee that I did (because, as noted, it was a whim) &#8212; that was it.</p>
<p>I have spent my life having people tell me that the solution to any emotional turmoil that I might experience lies in imitating THEIR behavior. I&#8217;ve rarely found such advice to be anything but simplistic.</p>
<p>Furthermore, THIS does not meet my definition of human interaction (if you define it differently, well, that&#8217;s fine). We&#8217;re not physically in the same room exchanging bursts of linguistic communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=6908&#038;cpage=1#comment-295902</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=6908#comment-295902</guid>
		<description>Be nice, y&#039;all. Remember that Bruno appeals to both socially awkward people and people who like to question and debate. So, just one main rule: please be civil/gentle to one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be nice, y&#8217;all. Remember that Bruno appeals to both socially awkward people and people who like to question and debate. So, just one main rule: please be civil/gentle to one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
