<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 04/03/2018</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brunostrip.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=7054</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 03:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rogan</title>
		<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=7054&#038;cpage=1#comment-296202</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 02:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=7054#comment-296202</guid>
		<description>But only if you assume that philosophy must equate to action, even the passive action of being. Demonstrably we can state two opposites and the world does not end; what, then, is the effect, or affect if you will, of these &#039;opposing&#039; philosophies? Could it be that we understand them never so well as we imagine? Or do they exist outside the framework of action, even that of contemplation, and thus occupy a sort of null-Zen space wherein their meaning, and even the meaning of their meaning, can be contemplated without danger of consequence?

Needs thought. I&#039;ll get back to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But only if you assume that philosophy must equate to action, even the passive action of being. Demonstrably we can state two opposites and the world does not end; what, then, is the effect, or affect if you will, of these &#8216;opposing&#8217; philosophies? Could it be that we understand them never so well as we imagine? Or do they exist outside the framework of action, even that of contemplation, and thus occupy a sort of null-Zen space wherein their meaning, and even the meaning of their meaning, can be contemplated without danger of consequence?</p>
<p>Needs thought. I&#8217;ll get back to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rexhinalt</title>
		<link>http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=7054&#038;cpage=1#comment-296201</link>
		<dc:creator>Rexhinalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brunostrip.com/wp/?p=7054#comment-296201</guid>
		<description>Put another way, philosophy is the antithesis of decisiveness.  This is because for every philosophy, there is an equal and opposite philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put another way, philosophy is the antithesis of decisiveness.  This is because for every philosophy, there is an equal and opposite philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
