See, there’s the problem, if emotions are interpretable, you need to use your reason to interpret them — a faculty I find entirely biased.
See, there’s the problem, if emotions are interpretable, you need to use your reason to interpret them — a faculty I find entirely biased.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« Aug | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
2014 Appearance Schedule
ABQ Comic Con Emerald City Comic Con TCAF (with TopatoCo) More to be added... past conventions |
Powered by WordPress with ComicPress |Subscribe: RSS
Howdy Chris!
“The Righteous Mind” by Jonathan Haidt addresses this dynamic in a way that makes it understandable. He even turned me, a long time rationalist, into . . . something else, I’m not sure there’s a name for his outlook yet, but I buy it. He even manages to explain our political divide in a way that doesn’t make the other side into evil demons (whoever you perceive the other side to be). Can’t recommend it highly enough.
-Cary
@Carym, Looks interesting. I’ll reserve it at the library. :)
Interesting…I’m a longtime fan of Prof. Haidt, since I read his paper “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail”. I wasn’t aware of this new book of his until I read your comment. I’ve downloaded the audiobook and am appreciating it very much. As you experienced, he changed my perspective a lot. He confirms the adage “You can’t reason a man out of an opinion he didn’t reason himself into.”
He and I corresponded for a while, during which time he described his research on the origins of morality and disgust, which obviously was leading to this book. I wish his work was more widely known; it would save a lot of venom in public discourse.