Bruno

Discussion (2) ¬

1. 
   ronald

   September 29, 2014 at 4:35 am | #

   I remain politely dubious about the “needs to get laid” theory. Plenty of sexually active people are nonetheless jerks (no pun intended).

   Really, when you think about it (“So don’t think about it.”), it’s odd that the “religious right” doesn’t take a stand against the idea that sex is a necessary prerequisite for good health because, after all, that would mean that all unmarried people would be doomed to poor health because, from the “religious right” perspective, non-marital sex is “bad” (except when they’re doing it, of course). It’d at least give them less time to devote to other subjects.

   On another note, does the “star” in the window in Panel 1 mean anything in particular? It’s not a Star of David and I don’t right off recall what else a six-pointed star might mean.
2. 
   Kona

   April 8, 2015 at 10:28 am | #

   Just speculating, it could be difficult to be known to be bisexual; it removes that many more people from your world you think you can count on not to have ulterior motives.

   Ronald: That’s a star? All I saw at first was a wheel with spokes. Now can’t unsee…