I still find this a somewhat interesting perspective. it was nice being able to funnel thoughts I had like this into art.
I still find this a somewhat interesting perspective. it was nice being able to funnel thoughts I had like this into art.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« Aug | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
2014 Appearance Schedule
ABQ Comic Con Emerald City Comic Con TCAF (with TopatoCo) More to be added... past conventions |
Powered by WordPress with ComicPress |Subscribe: RSS
Not that it matters but “shag” is a Briticism; I’ve rarely if ever heard Americans use it. Admittedly, Bruno came back from Britain not all that very much long ago, but…
I remember it being bandied about, at least with my friends. Maybe “The Spy who Shagged Me” from a few years before popularized it.
It IS an interesting perspective, and it suggests that the religious urge is closely tied to punishment/reward — that is, we need God so we can plead for more good things, and if we don’t get them, we know it’s time to sacrifice some more virgins or burn down the local Planned Parenthood office or in some other get God to respond, one way or another. This suggests that the actual intent is less important than any perceived response, even a hateful or inexplicable one. You can then write in the blanks, if you’re vengeful and cynical enough, and get a result you like whether or not God would approve of it. Explains quite a bit, really.
Better to think you’re receiving something from “God” via your own actions than to feel like nothing is happening when you pray, I guess?